Regulations

FinCEN Beneficial Ownership Reporting: Where the CTA Stands in 2026

The Corporate Transparency Act and FinCEN's Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) registry have had one of the most turbulent regulatory journeys in recent US financial-crime history — passed in 2021, operational from January 2024, paused by court rulings, partially restored by interim final rule, and now operating in a substantially narrower form than originally intended. This guide covers the 2026 status, the current obligations, and the operational implications for compliance teams.

Published: May 2026 Category: Regulations Read time: ~12 minutes
Quick Answer
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), enacted as part of the NDAA 2021, requires beneficial ownership reporting for entities formed or registered to do business in the United States. FinCEN's Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) registry became operational on 1 January 2024, with reporting obligations on 'reporting companies' (broadly, US-formed or US-registered entities outside specified exemptions) to identify their beneficial owners — natural persons exercising substantial control or owning 25%+ — and report identifying information to FinCEN. Following litigation that produced injunctions in late 2024 and early 2025, FinCEN issued an interim final rule in March 2025 that removed the reporting obligation for US-formed entities and US persons — restricting BOI reporting to foreign-formed entities registered to do business in the US and their non-US-person beneficial owners. The 2025 interim final rule reduced the operational scope of the regime substantially, though the framework remains in place for foreign entities and may be revisited by future rulemaking. The regime intersects with FATF Recommendation 24 on beneficial ownership transparency — the US is now substantively further from FATF baseline than it was in early 2024.

The CTA was the most significant beneficial ownership transparency reform in US AML history when enacted. Its implementation has been the most contested — moving through district court injunctions, Court of Appeals proceedings, and FinCEN rulemaking that materially narrowed the regime. Compliance teams operating in or with US entities have had to track an unusually fluid regulatory framework.

The current state (as of mid-2026) reflects FinCEN's March 2025 interim final rule. The regime remains operational for foreign-formed entities registered to do business in US states, but the broader US-formed-entity obligation has been removed. For compliance teams: the BOI registry is no longer a comprehensive source of US beneficial ownership data, and the firm's KYC and KYB workflows cannot rely on BOI data as a verification source for the substantial majority of US corporate customers. This is materially different from how the regime was envisaged at the time of enactment.

What the CTA Originally Required

The original CTA framework (as operational from 1 January 2024 until the March 2025 interim final rule) required:

  • Reporting companies. Corporations, limited liability companies and other entities created by filing a document with a US state secretary of state, plus foreign entities registered to do business in any US state. The definition was broad — most US corporate forms were in scope.
  • Exemptions. 23 categories of exempt entities, including SEC-reporting public companies, regulated financial institutions, large operating companies (over 20 full-time employees in the US and over $5 million in US-source revenue), tax-exempt entities, and dormant entities. Exempt entities did not have to file BOI reports.
  • Beneficial owner identification. Natural persons exercising 'substantial control' over the reporting company (senior officers, directors with meaningful authority, persons with significant decision-making power) and natural persons owning or controlling 25% or more of the ownership interests. Both categories had to be identified and reported.
  • Reportable information. Full legal name, date of birth, current residential address, and unique identifying number from an acceptable identity document (typically passport or driver's license), with a scan of the document. Reported through FinCEN's BOI E-Filing System.
  • Reporting timeline. Entities existing before 1 January 2024 had until 1 January 2025 to file initial reports. Entities formed on or after 1 January 2024 had 30 days from formation to file. Updates to reported information required within 30 days of any change.
  • Penalties. Civil penalties up to $500 per day for willful violations; criminal penalties up to $10,000 and two years' imprisonment for fraudulent reporting. Substantial penalties drove material compliance investment by reporting entities.

The framework was designed to align US beneficial ownership transparency with FATF Recommendation 24 expectations. FATF's Mutual Evaluation of the US had specifically identified the absence of a beneficial ownership register as a deficiency; the CTA was the policy response.

The 2024–2025 Litigation and Court Rulings

The CTA faced legal challenges from the moment FinCEN's implementing rules were finalised. The litigation history through 2025:

  • March 2024: National Small Business United v. Yellen (NSBU v. Yellen). The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled that the CTA was unconstitutional as applied to the NSBU plaintiffs, holding that Congress lacked enumerated authority to impose the reporting requirements. The ruling applied only to the named plaintiffs and NSBU members but indicated potential broader exposure.
  • December 2024: Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland. The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the CTA nationwide, finding likely constitutional infirmities. The injunction effectively paused the regime for all reporting companies pending appeal.
  • January 2025: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the district court's injunction, restoring CTA enforceability while the appeal proceeded. Within days, the Supreme Court intervened — though the Court's action was administrative rather than substantive — and ultimately the injunction was reinstated.
  • February 2025: Multiple parallel cases produced overlapping rulings. The litigation produced operational uncertainty for reporting companies; FinCEN's deadlines were repeatedly extended.
  • March 2025: FinCEN issued an interim final rule fundamentally narrowing the regime. The rule removed reporting obligations for US-formed entities and US-person beneficial owners; reporting was retained only for foreign-formed entities registered to do business in US states, and only for non-US-person beneficial owners of those entities. The rule was framed as responsive to ongoing litigation and as a 'risk-based' narrowing.

The litigation continues at the time of writing, with possibility that future rulings restore the broader regime or further narrow it. The interim final rule represents the operational current state but is itself subject to potential future change.

What the 2025 Interim Final Rule Changed

The March 2025 interim final rule (formally 'Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements; Interim Final Rule' published at 90 Fed. Reg. 13,688) made the following substantive changes:

  • US-formed entities removed from scope. Reporting companies as defined in the original rule no longer include US-formed entities. Domestic corporations, LLCs and similar entities created in US states are not subject to BOI reporting obligations under the current regime.
  • Foreign-formed entities remain in scope where registered to do business in US. Entities formed outside the US that register to do business in any US state (typically through filing a certificate of authority or equivalent) are reporting companies. The scope captures the foreign-entity-doing-US-business pattern that was a substantive concern in the original framework.
  • Non-US-person beneficial owners only. Of the beneficial owners of in-scope foreign entities, only those who are not US persons are required to be reported. US-person beneficial owners (US citizens, US residents) are excluded from the reporting obligation even when they are beneficial owners of in-scope foreign entities.
  • Continued reporting obligations for in-scope entities. Where an entity remains in scope, the previously-established reporting obligations continue — initial reports within 30 days of registration to do business in the US, updates within 30 days of changes.
  • Existing reports preserved. Entities that filed BOI reports prior to the March 2025 rule are not required to take action to withdraw the reports; FinCEN maintains the data subject to the access framework that applies to the registry.

The operational impact is substantial. The original CTA was projected to require reports from approximately 32 million US-formed entities. The narrowed regime applies to a much smaller population — foreign-formed entities doing business in US states, estimated at a small fraction of the original scope.

Operational Implications for Compliance Teams

Three categories of compliance teams are affected differently by the current state:

US reporting companies that previously filed. The March 2025 rule does not require withdrawal of filed reports. Entities that filed BOI reports under the original framework can either leave the reports in place or, if they would prefer to have the reports removed, may request withdrawal under FinCEN's administrative procedures (procedures that have been clarified in subsequent FinCEN guidance). For most operational purposes, leaving the report in place is the simpler approach.

US financial institutions and KYC platforms. The BOI registry was envisaged as a verification source for US KYC and KYB workflows — a check against an authoritative registry of US beneficial ownership. The narrowed regime removes this capability for most US corporate customers. KYC platforms have had to revert to the pre-CTA verification methodology — beneficial ownership self-declaration verified against state-level corporate records, public registries and commercial data sources. The result is that US KYB workflows in 2026 are operationally similar to those in 2023, with the BOI gap that the CTA was designed to close still effectively open.

Foreign entities doing business in the US. Foreign-formed entities that register to do business in US states remain subject to the full BOI reporting framework as applied to non-US-person beneficial owners. Compliance teams in foreign entities operating in US states should treat the reporting obligation as active. The narrower scope does not change the operational mechanics for entities that remain in scope.

FATF Recommendation 24 Tension
The narrowed regime puts the US substantively further from FATF Recommendation 24 expectations on beneficial ownership transparency. FATF's 2026 Mutual Evaluation cycle for the US is likely to identify the gap as a deficiency. Whether and how the US addresses the gap will depend on the trajectory of the underlying litigation and any future policy or rulemaking response.

Practical Steps for Compliance Programmes

Five operational priorities for compliance teams navigating the current state:

  • Update KYC/KYB beneficial ownership methodology. Where workflows had been designed around BOI registry verification, they should now revert to the established methodology of self-declaration plus independent verification against state-level corporate records, commercial UBO databases, and public sources. The verification rigour expected of regulated firms is unchanged; the source mix has changed.
  • Track regulatory developments closely. The litigation is ongoing and the regime is subject to further change. Compliance teams should monitor FinCEN announcements, federal court rulings and Treasury Department guidance, with the operational implications integrated into the firm's policy and procedure updates promptly.
  • Maintain BOI reporting for in-scope foreign entities. Foreign-formed entities doing business in US states should continue to file BOI reports as required. The reporting infrastructure, the 30-day timelines, and the penalty framework remain operational for in-scope entities.
  • Document the policy basis for KYB approach. Where regulated firms are operating KYB workflows on US corporate customers, the documentation should reflect the current state of the BOI regime and the firm's approach to beneficial ownership verification. Inspections will likely focus on whether the methodology is appropriate given the regulatory environment.
  • Engage with industry forums on emerging guidance. The ACAMS, BAFT and ABA AML compliance forums have been actively tracking the CTA developments. Engagement through industry bodies provides early visibility into emerging FinCEN positions and supervisory expectations.

For broader regulatory context across major jurisdictions see our MAS Notice 626, 6AMLD, and FATF Grey List 2026 guides — and for KYB platform context our KYB solution overview.

KYB That Works Across the Regulatory Landscape

One Constellation's KYB platform supports beneficial ownership verification across 130+ jurisdictions, integrating BOI registry data where available with broader public-source verification — designed for the operational reality of mixed regulatory environments.

← FATF Grey List 2026 All Articles
Scroll to Top