One Constellation
Free Tool

Free Sanctions & PEP Screening Check

See how sanctions and PEP screening works. Enter a name to view exactly what a live screening checks — across sanctions lists, PEP databases and adverse media.

Educational demonstration only. This tool does not query live watchlists and does not provide a pass/fail result or a compliance decision. For real screening, book a demo.

⚠️ This is an illustrative demo, not a live screening. It does not confirm whether anyone is or isn't sanctioned. Use the One Constellation platform for real, auditable screening.

A live screening of this name would check:

✓Sanctions lists — OFAC, UN, EU, UK HMT, MAS and 80+ sources
✓PEP databases — politically exposed persons and their close associates
✓Adverse media — negative news across 60K+ sources and many languages
✓Fuzzy & alias matching — name variations, transliterations and spellings
✓Continuous re-screening — automatic re-check as lists update
Run a real screening — Book a Demo
How It Works

What Sanctions & PEP Screening Actually Does

Sanctions screening checks a customer or transaction against government and international watchlists to prevent dealings with designated parties. Because it is strict-liability, a single missed match can mean serious penalties — so screening must run at onboarding, on transactions, and continuously as lists change.

PEP screening identifies politically exposed persons — and their relatives and close associates — who carry higher corruption risk and require Enhanced Due Diligence. Alongside these, adverse-media screening surfaces negative news that may not yet appear on any official list.

The operational challenge is precision: literal name matching flags every similar name, so effective screening uses tuneable fuzzy matching and clear disposition workflows to separate genuine hits from noise.

Scope

What This Demo Shows, and What It Does Not

This tool is a demonstration of matching behaviour. It is useful for seeing how a name resolves against sanctions and PEP data and why a particular record surfaces — and it is deliberately not a compliance control. The difference matters, so it is worth being explicit about where the line falls.

What it shows. How fuzzy matching handles transliteration, name order and spelling variation; why a near match is returned rather than discarded; and what the evidence behind a hit looks like when it is presented properly rather than as a raw score.

What it does not do. It does not record a screening decision, retain an audit trail, re-screen the name when lists change, resolve ownership to catch entities caught by control rules, or produce anything a supervisor would accept as evidence that screening was performed. A single point-in-time lookup is not a screening programme, and nothing here should be filed as though it were.

That last point is the one firms most often get wrong in reverse: treating a clean result as a conclusion. A name that is clear today can be listed tomorrow, which is why ongoing re-screening, not the initial check, is where most sanctions exposure is actually managed.

In the Platform

From Demo to Real, Auditable Screening

This tool shows the idea. The One Constellation platform does it for real — at scale, in real time, with a full audit trail.

🚫

Sanctions Screening

Real-time screening across 80+ lists with tuneable matching. Learn more.

👤

PEP Screening

Tiered PEP and close-associate screening with automatic refresh. Learn more.

📰

Adverse Media

Structured negative-news screening across 60K+ sources. Learn more.

In Production

What a Real Screening Programme Adds

Moving from a lookup to a control means adding the parts this demo leaves out. In rough order of how often they are missed:

  • Re-screening on list change. The initial check is the easy part. Exposure accumulates between checks, so the whole book has to be re-screened whenever lists move — not on a calendar.
  • Ownership and control. Sanctions reach entities owned or controlled by designated persons even when the entity itself is not listed. That requires resolving the ownership chain, which name matching alone cannot do. See UBO unwrapping.
  • Tuning, with evidence. Thresholds set once and never revisited are the most common source of both noise and missed matches. Changes need to be tested and recorded, not adjusted quietly — our tuning methodology sets out how.
  • A decision record. For every alert: who reviewed it, what they saw, what they concluded and when. Under inspection this is the control, more than the matching engine that produced the alert.
  • List provenance. Which lists, from which source, refreshed how often, and what happens when a feed fails silently.

Our sanctions screening page covers how these run together, and what a screening programme involves covers the operating model around them.

FAQ

Sanctions & PEP Screening FAQ

Is this a real sanctions screening?+
No. This is a free educational tool that shows what a live sanctions and PEP screening checks and how matching works. It does not query live watchlists and must not be used to make a compliance decision. For real screening, book a screening.
What lists does real screening cover?+
A production screening with One Constellation checks 80+ sources — including OFAC, UN, EU, UK HMT and other sanctions lists, global PEP databases, and adverse-media sources.
Why do names produce false positives?+
Common names, aliases and transliterations mean literal matching flags many similar names. Real screening uses tuneable fuzzy matching and disposition tooling to manage this — see reducing false positives.
How do I run a real check on a customer?+
Through the One Constellation platform, which screens customers in real time and re-screens them automatically as lists update. Book a demo to get started.
Can I rely on this tool for compliance screening?+
No. It demonstrates matching behaviour; it does not retain a record, re-screen when lists change, or produce evidence a supervisor would accept. Use it to understand how matching behaves, not as a control.
Why does it return near matches rather than exact ones?+
Because exact matching misses most real hits. Names are transliterated inconsistently, ordered differently across cultures and recorded with varying spellings. A screening engine that only returns exact matches looks clean and is not.
Does a clean result mean the customer is clear?+
Only at that moment, against those lists. Designations change constantly, which is why ongoing re-screening rather than the onboarding check is where most sanctions exposure is actually managed.
Does screening a name cover companies it owns?+
Not by itself. Sanctions can reach entities owned or controlled by designated persons even where the entity is not itself listed, so catching those requires resolving ownership — not matching names.

Screen Customers for Real

Book a demo to run live sanctions, PEP and adverse-media screening with full audit trails on the One Constellation platform.

Scroll to Top