Cayman Islands AML Rules for Funds: What Changed on 18 September 2026
The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority's two new Rules, on an effective AML/CFT/CPF compliance programme and on sanctions compliance, took effect on 18 September 2026. This guide sets out what they add to the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for funds, fund managers and administrators: officers, the documented risk-based approach, investor due diligence, sanctions screening, the independent audit and outsourcing.
Cayman is the domicile of choice for offshore hedge funds and private funds, and the investor due diligence for those vehicles is usually performed by an administrator in another jurisdiction under delegation from the fund. That arrangement is exactly what CIMA's new Rules address: the fund remains responsible, the fund needs its own audit, and the fund's officers must be able to show CIMA how they stay satisfied with the work done in their name. This article is written for the people who have to produce that evidence: fund directors and general partners, the AMLCO and MLRO, the compliance teams of managers and administrators, and the investor-relations staff who collect the documents.
It is organised by obligation rather than by instrument, with the regulation or Rule paragraph cited at each point. For the Singapore and Hong Kong equivalents see MAS Notice SFA04-N02 for fund managers and Hong Kong SFC AML requirements for asset managers; for the investor-side process see investor onboarding.
What Changed on 18 September 2026
CIMA opened private sector consultation on both Rules in March 2026, published feedback statements in July 2026 and gazetted the Rules the same month; each Rule states that it takes effect sixty days after gazettal, on 18 September 2026. On 24 September 2026 CIMA published updated FAQs in response to industry questions. Three points from the FAQs set the tone:
- The Rule on the compliance programme "does not introduce new obligations but rather enhance[s] the Authority's expectations for the design, implementation, and maintenance" of the programme; many provisions sharpen what the AMLRs already required (FAQ 4).
- CIMA will assess compliance through its risk-based supervision, with on-site inspections for higher and medium-risk entities and desk-based reviews for others, and "does not intend to adopt a blanket enforcement approach upon the Rule's effective date". The administrative fines framework for breaches of the Rule "is not yet in effect" (FAQs 3 and 4).
- Firms are not required to commission a new AML audit solely because the Rules came into force; audits continue on the entity's risk-based cycle (FAQ 34 and the 24 September notice).
Where the Rule and the AMLRs conflict, the AMLRs prevail (Rule 4.4). Where the Rule conflicts with earlier guidance notes or policy statements, the Rule prevails (13.2). The Rule cites sections 6(1)(b) and 34(1) of the Monetary Authority Act as its basis (4.1 and 4.2; CIMA's FAQ 9 refers to section 6(3)(b)) and has the force of law (13.2).
The Cayman AML Framework for Funds
The instruments a fund's compliance file now has to track:
| Instrument | Status | What it does for a fund, manager or administrator |
|---|---|---|
| Proceeds of Crime Act (2025 Revision), as amended by the Proceeds of Crime (Amendment) Act 2026 | Primary legislation | Defines money laundering and "relevant financial business", creates the reporting duty to the Financial Reporting Authority (FRA) and empowers the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations |
| Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (2025 Revision), the AMLRs | Consolidated 31 December 2024; published 28 January 2025; last amended by the 2024 amendment regulations of 9 April 2024 | The operative rules: AML officers (regs 3 and 33), systems and training (reg 5), group programmes (reg 6), risk assessment (regs 8 and 8A), CDD (reg 12), simplified CDD (regs 21 to 26), enhanced CDD, PEPs, records (reg 31) and internal reporting (reg 34). Where the Rules and the AMLRs conflict, the AMLRs prevail (Rule 4.4) |
| Guidance Notes on the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing, February 2024 | Issued under section 34 of the Monetary Authority Act; replaces the 5 June 2020 edition | Minimum requirements and guidance; Part VI is sector-specific guidance for mutual funds and mutual fund administrators. Courts and CIMA take non-compliance into account |
| Rule on Effective Compliance Programme for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers | Dated July 2026; in effect 18 September 2026, sixty days after gazettal (Rule 14.1); has the force of law (13.2) | Minimum requirements for governance, the AMLCO, MLRO and DMLRO, the documented risk-based approach, policies and procedures, CDD, records, outsourcing, training and the independent audit |
| Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions | Dated July 2026; in effect 18 September 2026 | Screening, re-screening on list updates, freezing without delay, reporting to the FRA on the Compliance Reporting Form, false-positive handling and training |
| Terrorism Act, Proliferation Financing (Prohibition) Act, Beneficial Ownership Transparency Act, UK Overseas Orders in Council | In force | Terrorist financing and proliferation financing offences, designations, beneficial ownership transparency, and the UK and UN sanctions that apply in the Cayman Islands |
Who Is in Scope
The Rule applies to all financial services providers regulated and supervised by CIMA under the Regulatory Acts, including branches, subsidiaries, affiliates and other members of a CIMA-regulated financial group (5.1). In the fund sector that means:
- Funds. CIMA's FAQs for funds state that a fund, regulated or unregulated, that conducts relevant financial business in or from the Cayman Islands must designate an AMLCO, MLRO and DMLRO under regulations 3(1) and 33. Regulated mutual funds (licensed, administered and registered funds under the Mutual Funds Act, the last requiring a minimum equity interest of CI$80,000, about US$100,000, per investor or a listing on an approved exchange) and registered private funds are regulated by CIMA and are therefore FSPs within the Rules. Asked in consultation whether funds regulated under the Mutual Funds Act and the Private Funds Act are in scope, CIMA answered in its July 2026 feedback statement that investment funds have their own obligations under the AMLRs, remain ultimately responsible for them even where they rely on administrators, and fall within relevant financial business under Schedule 6 to the Proceeds of Crime Act, at least under paragraph 19 (investing, administering or managing funds or money on behalf of other persons).
- Mutual fund administrators licensed under the Mutual Funds Act, which the Guidance Notes treat as having separate AML obligations from the funds they administer (Part VI, G.2).
- Managers and advisers licensed or registered under the Securities Investment Business Act. The Guidance Notes apply Parts I, II and the securities sector part to licensees and to persons specified in Schedule 4 of SIBA (the registered-person category), who do not need a licence but still carry on securities investment business (Part VIII, B.1).
- Branches, subsidiaries and affiliates of a CIMA-regulated financial group (Rule 5.1). Asked whether sector-specific exemptions will be granted, CIMA's FAQ 6 answers that the obligations apply to all CIMA-regulated FSPs conducting relevant financial business, regardless of business model or outsourcing arrangements.
AML Officers: AMLCO, MLRO and DMLRO
The officer requirements are the most visible part of the regime for funds, because every fund, including an unregulated one, must make the appointments and a regulated fund must notify CIMA through the REEFS portal. The Rule adds qualitative conditions to the AMLR designations.
| Role | Requirement | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer (AMLCO) | A natural person at managerial level who ensures the AMLR measures are adopted and acts as the point of contact with competent authorities. Must have authority over the AML/CFT/CPF systems, direct access to senior management and the governing body, independence from the business functions it oversees (or managed conflicts), sufficient resources, and knowledge of the business and of sector typologies. Reports to the governing body at least annually | AMLRs regs 3(1) and 4; Rule 7.1(c), 8.1, 8.2 and 8.8 |
| Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) and Deputy (DMLRO) | Natural persons at managerial level. The MLRO receives and assesses internal reports and files external SARs with the FRA; the DMLRO acts in the MLRO's absence. The MLRO and DMLRO must be two different people; the same person may be AMLCO and MLRO (or DMLRO) | AMLRs regs 33 and 34; Rule 7.1(d), 8.9 to 8.11; CIMA FAQs for funds, 1 Feb 2019 |
| Location and outsourcing | The officers may be based outside the Cayman Islands provided they meet the suitability criteria and can comply with Cayman law; all SARs relating to Cayman funds are filed with the FRA. The function may be outsourced, but accountability stays with the FSP and its governing body | CIMA FAQs for funds (Q8 and Q9); Rule FAQ 14 and 24 |
| Segregated portfolio companies and series trusts | Appointments are made to the fund; for an SPC, to the core company, not to each segregated portfolio. A series trust whose individual trusts operate as standalone funds appoints officers to each | CIMA FAQs for funds (Q3 and Q4) |
| Fit and proper | Suitably qualified and experienced; management level reporting directly to the board or equivalent; autonomous (the final decision-maker on whether to file a SAR); with access to all relevant material; able to dedicate sufficient time | CIMA notice of 7 June 2021; Rule 8.1 and 8.11 |
The Documented Risk-Based Approach
Section 9 of the Rule turns the AMLR risk-assessment duty into a documentation standard that CIMA can inspect. The required elements:
- Assess ML, TF and PF risks in relation to customers, the countries where customers reside or operate, products, services and transactions, and delivery channels (AMLRs reg 8(1); Rule 9.2(a)).
- Start from the National Risk Assessment. The Rule requires the FSP to review and, at a minimum, consider the findings of the most recent Cayman Islands NRA (9.2(b)), and a finding of low risk is only valid if it is consistent with the NRA or the supervisory authority's findings, whichever is more recent (AMLRs reg 21(2); Guidance Notes Part VI, D.5).
- Document inherent and residual risk and how risks are aggregated into an overall rating (9.6), keep the assessment current, and update it without delay on trigger events such as new products or business lines, expansion into higher-risk geographies, mergers or restructuring, and economic or geopolitical developments (9.2(f)).
- Approve and review. Policies must be approved by the governing body; procedures and controls by senior management or the governing body (10.2). Controls approved by senior management must be consistent with national requirements (AMLRs reg 8(2)(d)).
- Fund-specific risk factors named in the Guidance Notes: investors in multiple countries, foreign PEPs and sanctioned countries; the investor profile (regulated institutional investors versus trusts, charities and high-net-worth individuals); low minimum subscriptions and funds not coming from a regulated institution; liquid redemption terms with no lock-up; non-face-to-face subscriptions, redemptions and transfers; frequent or unexplained changes of service provider (Part VI, C and D).
Investor Due Diligence
For a fund the customers are the investors, and for an administrator the customers are the fund and its operators. The table sets out the CDD rules that matter most at subscription and redemption, with the Rule's additions.
| Topic | Requirement | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Who is the applicant for business | For the fund, the investors. For an administrator, the fund and its operators (directors, general partner or trustee). Promoters are not applicants, though verifying them is good practice | Guidance Notes Part VI, E.7 |
| Identification and verification | Identify and verify the customer from reliable, independent source documents, data or information; verify the authority and identity of anyone acting on the customer's behalf; identify and take reasonable measures to verify the beneficial owner; understand the purpose and intended nature of the relationship; and conduct ongoing due diligence. For legal persons and arrangements: name, legal form and proof of existence, constitutional documents, identity of the director, general partner or equivalent senior manager, registered office and principal place of business | AMLRs reg 12(1) and (2); Rule 10.5.1 to 10.5.5 |
| Beneficial owner | The natural person who ultimately owns or controls the customer or on whose behalf a transaction is conducted, including a natural person who owns or controls 10% or more of the shares or voting rights of a legal person (other than a company listed on a recognised stock exchange), anyone otherwise exercising ultimate effective control, and for a legal arrangement the trustee or other person exercising ultimate effective control. For trusts, identify the settlor, trustees, protector, enforcer, beneficiaries and any natural person with ultimate effective control | AMLRs reg 2; Rule 10.5.16 and 10.5.17 |
| Timing | Generally before or at the time the relationship is established. Where verification cannot be completed first, the FAQs allow completion as soon as practicable only in limited, low-risk circumstances permitted by the AMLRs, with heightened monitoring in the meantime. A subscription to a mutual fund is not treated as a one-off transaction; a one-off transaction above KYD 10,000 (or linked smaller transactions) triggers CDD | Rule 10.5.2, 10.5.3 and 10.5.10; Guidance Notes Part VI, F.5; Rule FAQ 22 |
| Redemptions | Where verification of an investor is still outstanding at redemption, use the redemption to obtain it; pay proceeds only to the investor, not a third party, and only once outstanding documentation has been collected and verified | Guidance Notes Part VI, F.4 |
| Enhanced due diligence | Required where the customer or relationship is high-risk under the AMLRs or the FSP's own assessment; the FSP must not open the account or continue the relationship if it cannot perform the EDD required | AMLRs reg 17; Rule 10.5.7 and 10.5.20 |
| Simplified due diligence | Only where a low level of risk has been identified under reg 8, commensurate with the lower risk, and never where ML, TF or PF is known or suspected. Where the firm already knows the applicant's identity and the purpose of the relationship and has identified no suspicious activity (reg 22(1)(a) to (c)), verification is not required for "acceptable applicants" such as another person subject to reg 5, a government body in a low-risk country, a business regulated by an overseas regulatory authority in a low-risk country, a company listed on a recognised exchange with adequate beneficial-ownership disclosure, or certain pension funds, provided the basis is evidenced in writing. The Rule adds: a complete risk assessment, consistency with the NRA, documentation of the basis, periodic reassessment and continued sanctions screening | AMLRs regs 21 and 22; Rule 10.5.21 to 10.5.23 |
| Eligible introducers | Verification may be dispensed with where an introducer within reg 22(1)(d) gives a written assurance covering identity, beneficial owner, purpose, source of funds, its own supervision and CDD measures, and access to records without delay; the relying FSP remains liable for the introducer's failures and ultimately responsible for CDD | AMLRs reg 25 |
| Payments from bank accounts | In low-risk cases verification may be deferred where payment comes from an account in the investor's name at a Cayman bank or a bank in a low-risk country, but not where onward payment is to be made to the investor or anyone else; verification is required before proceeds are paid | AMLRs reg 23; CIMA notice of 1 Feb 2019 |
Two design points follow. First, because the beneficial-ownership threshold is 10%, a fund's investor file for a corporate or partnership investor must go further than regimes that stop at 25%; our UBO threshold lookup and the guide to UBO discovery in complex structures cover the mechanics. Second, simplified due diligence is a documented determination, not a category: the Rule requires the risk assessment, the NRA consistency check, the written basis, a periodic reassessment and continued sanctions screening for every investor treated as low risk (10.5.21 to 10.5.23). See our glossary entry on simplified due diligence.
The Sanctions Rule
The second Rule consolidates what the AMLRs, the Terrorism Act, the Proliferation Financing (Prohibition) Act and the UK Overseas Orders in Council already required, and adds explicit operating standards. The Governor is the competent authority for financial sanctions, with reporting delegated to the FRA (1.2).
- Sanctions compliance must be an integral part of the AML/CFT/CPF programme, with policies, procedures, systems and controls (7.1), and sanctions must be considered in risk assessments (7.2). A customer's geographic risk cannot be rated "low" where its country is subject to ML/TF/PF-related sanctions by the United Kingdom, the United Nations, the United States or OFAC (7.3).
- Screen applicants, customers, beneficial owners, transactions, service providers and other relevant parties, including connected persons, against the UK Sanctions List and any other list that applies through the Overseas Orders in Council (7.4 and 2.1.18). Simplified due diligence does not reduce or waive screening: all customers must be re-screened whenever a sanctions list is updated, regardless of their risk classification (7.5 and 7.11), and the systems must act "without delay", which the Rule defines as ideally within hours of a UN designation (2.1.23).
- On a true match or suspicion, freeze funds and economic resources without delay and without prior notice, make nothing available to the designated person or entities it owns or controls unless licensed by the Governor, and report to the FRA on the Compliance Reporting Form (7.7, 7.13.3 and 7.17 to 7.18). Record every action and its rationale (7.9).
- Take reasonable steps to clear potential matches by comparing other identifying information before treating them as false positives (7.19), and train staff regularly on identifying designated persons and frozen assets (7.20). See our guide to sanctions screening.
The Independent AML Audit
The audit is the provision that has generated most of the industry questions, which is why CIMA's FAQ update of 24 September 2026 concentrated on it.
- The obligation. An FSP must establish and maintain independent audit procedures to review and test the compliance programme, at a frequency commensurate with its size, complexity and risk profile, carried out by suitably qualified persons who are independent of the design, implementation and operation of the controls audited, and the audit report must be filed with CIMA as soon as practically possible after completion (Rule 12.1 and 12.2). CIMA's FAQ 32 notes that the underlying requirement already existed under the AMLRs; FAQ 42 identifies it as regulation 5(a)(ix), the risk-based independent audit function.
- Internal or external. The audit may be done internally, but not for more than two consecutive audit cycles; the next one must be external (12.3). The AMLCO, MLRO and DMLRO cannot audit the programme they are responsible for, whether in-house or outsourced (FAQ 39).
- No universal deadline. The Rule does not set a first-filing date or require an audit because the Rule came into force; audits follow the FSP's risk-based audit programme, and CIMA will first consider the FSP's risk assessment (FAQs 33 and 34). The FAQs give illustrative frequencies of every two years for higher-risk, three for medium and four for lower-risk entities (FAQ 38).
- Funds that outsource everything still need their own audit, and a service-provider-level audit or population-based review is not sufficient on its own: the auditor must obtain evidence on the individual fund's investor onboarding controls, ongoing due diligence, third-party arrangements, internal reporting, training, record keeping and risk-based approach (FAQs 42, 43 and 45). Risk-based sampling is allowed if coverage can be demonstrated (FAQ 45).
- Remediation. Deficiencies must be remediated within timeframes matching their materiality (12.4), and findings do not invalidate the audit (CIMA notice of 24 September 2026). See our AML internal audit checklist.
Outsourcing, Delegation and Reliance
Most Cayman funds outsource investor onboarding to an administrator and may rely on introducers for distribution. The Rule does not stop that; it sets the evidence the fund must hold.
- The AMLRs allow an FSP to delegate the performance of any function or rely on another person to perform it, but responsibility for compliance remains with the FSP (reg 3(2) and (3)); the Rule repeats that for third parties and group members (5.3 and 10.4) and requires the FSP to show CIMA on request how it remains satisfied (10.4).
- Before outsourcing any part of the compliance programme, assess the risks including country risk, perform due diligence on the provider's fitness, competence and capability, record the CDD done on the provider, and set out both parties' rights and obligations in the agreement (10.7.1 to 10.7.4). An arrangement must not go ahead or continue where CIMA's access to data could be impeded by confidentiality, secrecy, privacy or data-protection restrictions (10.7.5).
- Notify CIMA in writing of any outsourcing that relates to material functions of the compliance programme (10.3(e) and 10.7.6). Buying third-party training is not outsourcing for this purpose (footnote 4).
- For funds and administrators, the Guidance Notes say each has its own obligation to maintain procedures, and the operators should document, by board resolution or equivalent, how the fund's procedures are delegated or relied upon (Part VI, G.2 to G.7).
Records, Training and Reporting
- Transaction records, CDD identification data, account files and business correspondence for at least five years after the end of the relationship or the one-off transaction, available to CIMA without delay (AMLRs reg 31; Rule 10.6.1); beneficial-ownership records for at least five years after the customer is dissolved or ceases to be a customer (10.6.4).
- Records of declined business, the PEP register, competent authority requests, SARs, transaction alerts and sanctions monitoring (8.5).
- A documented training plan with recipients, topics, methods and frequency; training at least annually for all relevant staff, the governing body, agents and outsourced parties; and a record of each session's date, attendees and content (11.5 to 11.8 and 11.14). Employee screening on hiring and ongoing fit and proper checks (11.3 and 11.4).
- SARs to the FRA without delay where there is knowledge, suspicion or reasonable grounds to suspect ML, TF or PF, with confidentiality safeguards and no tipping off (12.6 to 12.8).
A Readiness Checklist for Funds, Managers and Administrators
Confirm the officer appointments and their evidence
Three natural persons or two with a shared AMLCO/MLRO role, all at managerial level, with the MLRO and DMLRO different people. Hold the letters of appointment, CVs, the board resolution and the REEFS notifications, and the annual AMLCO report to the board.
Rebuild the risk assessment against the Rule
Customer, geography, product, transaction and delivery-channel factors; the NRA findings; inherent and residual risk; trigger events; approval minutes. Where investors are rated low risk, record why that is consistent with the NRA.
Re-paper the investor CDD procedure
Applicant-for-business table for each entity; the 10% beneficial-ownership threshold; timing and heightened monitoring where verification is deferred; redemption controls; the written basis for every simplified-due-diligence and eligible-introducer decision; EDD triggers and approvals.
Prove the sanctions programme
Lists covered, re-screening on every list update for every customer regardless of risk tier, freeze and CRF procedures, false-positive clearance records and training logs.
Plan the independent audit
Set the frequency from the risk rating, decide internal or external within the two-cycle limit, scope it to the fund's own programme including outsourced functions, and diarise the filing with CIMA.
Review every outsourcing and reliance arrangement
Provider due diligence on file, agreements that set out rights and obligations and preserve CIMA's access, and written notification to CIMA of material compliance outsourcing.
Check records and training
Five-year retention clocks, the PEP and declined-business registers, and an annual training plan with attendance records.
How One Constellation Supports Cayman Funds and Their Administrators
One Constellation gives fund managers, fund administrators and transfer agents one system for the investor-side obligations in this article: an investor onboarding portal that collects subscription documents, identity verification for individual investors, KYB and beneficial-ownership tracing to the 10% threshold for corporate, trust and partnership investors, sanctions, PEP and adverse-media screening at onboarding with automatic re-screening when lists change, investor risk rating with a documented basis for simplified or enhanced measures, transaction monitoring of subscriptions, redemptions and transfers, and case management with SAR workflows. Every determination, approval and periodic review is recorded against the investor, so a fund's AMLCO, its auditor and CIMA can see the evidence for each file. See investor onboarding, AML compliance for fund managers and our guide to operational due diligence, where the same files are tested by investors.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the new Cayman Islands AML Rules that took effect on 18 September 2026?
Two CIMA Rules: the Rule on Effective Compliance Programme for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers, and the Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions. Both are dated July 2026, came into effect sixty days after gazettal on 18 September 2026, have the force of law, and supplement the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, which prevail in any conflict.
Does every Cayman fund need an AMLCO, MLRO and DMLRO?
Yes. CIMA's FAQs for funds state that a fund, regulated or unregulated, that conducts relevant financial business in or from the Cayman Islands must designate a natural person at managerial level to each role under regulations 3(1) and 33 of the AMLRs. The MLRO and DMLRO must be different people; the same person may hold the AMLCO and MLRO roles. The officers may be based outside the Cayman Islands if they meet the suitability criteria, and regulated funds notify the appointments through REEFS.
Does a Cayman fund that outsources everything to an administrator still need its own AML audit?
Yes. CIMA's FAQ 42 states that a regulated investment fund must still undertake an AML audit under regulation 5(a)(ix) of the AMLRs even if all or substantially all of its operations are outsourced. The audit must obtain evidence about the individual fund's compliance programme; a service-provider-level audit on its own is not sufficient. Under Rule 12.3 the audit may be internal, but not for more than two consecutive cycles.
How often must a Cayman fund have an AML audit?
The Rule does not prescribe a frequency; it must be commensurate with the fund's size, complexity and risk profile and follow its documented risk-based audit programme. CIMA's FAQ 38 gives illustrative cycles of every two years for higher-risk, three years for medium-risk and four years for lower-risk entities, and FAQ 34 confirms that no audit is required solely because the Rule came into force.
What is the beneficial ownership threshold under the Cayman AML Regulations?
Regulation 2 of the AMLRs defines a beneficial owner to include a natural person who ultimately owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the shares or voting rights of a legal person (other than a company listed on a recognised stock exchange), anyone who otherwise exercises ultimate effective control over its management, and, for a legal arrangement, the trustee or other person exercising ultimate effective control.
Can a Cayman fund apply simplified due diligence to its investors?
Only where it has identified and assessed a low level of risk under regulation 8, the simplified measures are commensurate with that lower risk, the finding is consistent with the National Risk Assessment or the supervisory authority's findings, and there is no knowledge or suspicion of money laundering, terrorist financing or proliferation financing. The Rule requires the basis to be documented and periodically reassessed, and sanctions screening continues regardless; the Sanctions Rule requires all customers to be re-screened whenever a list is updated.
Sources
- Cayman Islands: Anti-Money Laundering Regulations (2025 Revision), consolidated 31 December 2024 (PDF on cima.ky)
- CIMA: Rule on Effective Compliance Programme for the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing for Financial Services Providers, July 2026 (PDF)
- CIMA: Rule on Compliance with Financial Sanctions and Targeted Financial Sanctions, July 2026 (PDF)
- CIMA: AML/CFT FAQs on the two Rules (updated 24 September 2026)
- CIMA: Summary of Private Sector Consultation and Feedback Statement, Rule on Effective Compliance Programme for the Prevention and Detection of ML, TF, PF for FSPs, July 2026 (PDF)
- CIMA industry notice, 24 September 2026: Updated AML & Sanctions Rules FAQs Now Available
- CIMA: Guidance Notes on the Prevention and Detection of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation Financing in the Cayman Islands, February 2024 (PDF)
- CIMA industry notice, 1 February 2019: AML FAQs for Funds
- CIMA industry notice, 1 February 2019: Appointment of MLRO, AMLCO for Funds
- CIMA industry notice, 7 June 2021: The Appointment, Duties and Responsibilities of Anti-Money Laundering Officers
- CIMA: Investment Funds (regulation of funds and fund administrators)
- CIMA: Investment Funds Regulatory Measures
- CIMA: AML/CFT Legislative Framework
This article is general information, not legal advice. Requirements change — check the current text with the regulator before relying on it.
Investor Files a Cayman Auditor Can Test
See how fund managers, administrators and transfer agents keep identity, 10% beneficial ownership, screening, risk rating and periodic reviews for every investor in one record, ready for the AMLCO, the auditor and CIMA.
